Design Analysis of Commercialized Building using Non-Identical Slab Arrangements

Abstract

Abstract: Analysis and design of buildings must take earthquakes into account. Analyzing how a structure will react to a given set of loads is called structural analysis. Design is the process of determining the structure's proper parameters. It would take a long time to do structural analysis and design by hand. Any building may be easily analysed and designed with the help of software. The goal of this research and design study is to compare and contrast four common commercial building slab configurations—the conventional slab, the flat slab with drop panels, the grid/waffle slab, and the structure with a load bearing wall. At get to the results, a study was run in STAAD to analyse the impact of varying pressures on two different slab designs. The cutting edge of computer programming. The IS-1893:2002 standard mandates the incorporation of seismic forces. We used IS-456:2000 to determine how wide, tall, and deep to make the beams, columns, and slabs. IS-875:1987 (Parts 1 and 2) specifies the requirements for applying load combinations, dead loads, and imposed loads (Parts 3 and 5). (Part 5). Wind speeds of 55 metres per second and an earthquake zone of 5 will be employed as criteria in the next research. The results of a research comparing the displacements, moments, shear forces, and axial forces in two different slab pattern structures are shown using bar charts. Data is presented in the form of tables and bar charts. In general, the greater the number of stories, the greater the amount of movement between floors. Buildings using grid slabs performed better in the examination of the building's resistance to wind and seismic loads, and they were also shown to be more cost-effective