Abstract
The classical paradigm, according to which the key to life consists in the development of one's own identity, must be overcome. The proposal for a progressive “identification” is an imposture that must be “denatured” and, therefore, “deconstructed”, since it depends on a historical project of power. J. Rancière and P. B. Preciado, among others, promote, in response, an ethical model of “disidentification”. Human existence should advance, leaving behind at every step what until then was considered one's own identity. In these lines, the philosophical foundations of this idea are analyzed, its presence in some contemporary interdisciplinary debates is evaluated, and it is concluded that, in its most radical versions, it constitutes an "ontology of the impossible" (Preciado, 2019: 285).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
