Desiccation Risk Drives the Spatial Ecology of an Invasive Anuran (Rhinella marina) in the Australian Semi-Desert

Reid Tingley,Richard Shine,Carlos A Navas

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025979

Abstract

Some invasive species flourish in places that impose challenges very different from those faced in their native geographic ranges. Cane toads (Rhinella marina) are native to tropical and subtropical habitats of South and Central America, but have colonised extremely arid regions over the course of their Australian invasion. We radio-tracked 44 adult cane toads at a semi-arid invasion front to investigate how this invasive anuran has managed to expand its geographic range into arid areas that lie outside of its native climatic niche. As predicted from their low physiological control over rates of evaporative water loss, toads selected diurnal shelter sites that were consistently cooler and damper (and thus, conferred lower water loss rates) than nearby random sites. Desiccation risk also had a profound influence on rates of daily movement. Under wet conditions, toads that were far from water moved further between shelter sites than did conspecifics that remained close to water, presumably in an attempt to reach permanent water sources. However, this relationship was reversed under dry conditions, such that only toads that were close to permanent water bodies made substantial daily movements. Toads that were far from water bodies also travelled along straighter paths than did conspecifics that generally remained close to water. Thus, behavioural flexibility—in particular, an ability to exploit spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the availability of moist conditions—has allowed this invasive anuran to successfully colonize arid habitats in Australia. This finding illustrates that risk assessment protocols need to recognise that under some circumstances an introduced species may be able to thrive in conditions far removed from any that it experiences in its native range.

Highlights

Human activities have introduced species to areas that lie far outside of their native geographic ranges
What Factors Drive Cane Toad Dispersal? We investigated whether three abiotic variables influenced daily movement rates of radio-tracked toads after accounting for snouturostlye length (SUL): (i) mean nightly temperature, (ii) number of days since rain, and (iii) distance to the nearest water body
Toads that were far from water moved further than did conspecifics that remained close to water, but this relationship was reversed under dry conditions

Summary

Introduction

Human activities have introduced species to areas that lie far outside of their native geographic ranges. A small proportion of the global fauna and flora have ever been introduced to a novel environment [1,2], but many of these translocated species flourish and spread widely in their new ranges [1,3,4,5,6] This is surprising, in that we might expect organisms that have evolved under one set of selective forces (reflecting biotic and abiotic challenges confronted in the native range) to be poorly suited to a different environment that poses a novel suite of challenges [7]. The absence of ‘suitable’ environmental conditions at a given introduction point may not prevent an invader from thriving at that location once introduced

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion