Abstract

This study sought to understand the difference between financial performance of companies with family characteristics vis‐à‐vis non‐family companies. We used the references of Anderson and Reeb (2003), Lee (2006) and Martinez et al. (2007). This research had a quantitative nature through analysis of variance with the use of covariates (ANCOVA), as well as a robustness test from two multiple regressions. The dependent variables were the costly liabilities and net operating profit. The independent variables were the company's characteristics (family ownership control, presence of family members in the presidency or vice‐presidency of the board and the presence of family members occupying positions of president or vice president). Covariates were chosen as the size of the company (through Total Assets), age (time of foundation) and the sector of the company (from the rank of BM&FBovespa). For multiple regressions, the dependent variables were the Market Value and Enterprise Value. The results obtained show differences to financial results of each type of company. For costly liabilities, the presence of familiar attributes contributed to a lower recurrence of the use of third‐party capital. In net operating profit, the results of companies with familiar attributes were lower than non‐family firms. In the regressions, the results of family firms were worse than the non‐familiar.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.