Abstract

Associated Procladius Skuse (Holotanypus Roback) material from the Sublette collection was found to have specimens with undescribed immature stages. Pupal exuviae of two species are described for the first time: P. barbatulus Sublette and P. clavus Roback. Adult and larval features are included for P. barbatulus. In addition, specimens of Nearctic P. denticulatus Sublette are compared to Palearctic P. signatus (Zetterstedt) to determine if exuviae can separate these species or suggest that P. signatus is a senior synonym. Finally, associated pupal and larval traits of P. prolongatus Roback are compared to the original description, corroborating the theory that features are unique enough to warrant subgeneric status.

Highlights

  • Within Procladius Skuse, Holotanypus Roback is a diverse subgenus in the Nearctic region with 18 described species (Ashe and O’Connor 2009), of which six have not previously been described in the pupal stage

  • While comparing recently collected material to the Sublette collection at the University of Minnesota, a number of associated specimens were noted within Procladius, including two species (P. barbatulus Sublette and P. clavus Roback) with undescribed pupal exuviae

  • We compare an associated specimen of the Nearctic P. denticulatus Sublette to the morphologically similar Palearctic P. signatus (Zetterstedt) to determine if the pupal stage can be used to better distinguish these species

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Within Procladius Skuse, Holotanypus Roback is a diverse subgenus in the Nearctic region with 18 described species (Ashe and O’Connor 2009), of which six have not previously been described in the pupal stage. While comparing recently collected material to the Sublette collection at the University of Minnesota, a number of associated specimens were noted within Procladius, including two species (P. barbatulus Sublette and P. clavus Roback) with undescribed pupal exuviae. We compare an associated specimen of the Nearctic P. denticulatus Sublette to the morphologically similar Palearctic P. signatus (Zetterstedt) to determine if the pupal stage can be used to better distinguish these species. We used eight associated rearings from Alaska to reevaluate if P. prolongatus Roback is unique enough to have a separate subgenus designation (Roback 1980, 1982)

Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.