Abstract
Public reporting of measures of hospital performance is an important component of quality improvement efforts in many countries. However, it can be challenging to provide an overall characterization of hospital performance because there are many measures of quality. In the United States, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reports over 100 measures that describe various domains of hospital quality, such as outcomes, the patient experience and whether established processes of care are followed. Although individual quality measures provide important insight, it is challenging to understand hospital performance as characterized by multiple quality measures. Accordingly, we developed a novel approach for characterizing hospital performance that highlights the similarities and differences between hospitals and identifies common patterns of hospital performance. Specifically, we built a semi-supervised machine learning algorithm and applied it to the publicly-available quality measures for 1,614 U.S. hospitals to graphically and quantitatively characterize hospital performance. In the resulting visualization, the varying density of hospitals demonstrates that there are key clusters of hospitals that share specific performance profiles, while there are other performance profiles that are rare. Several popular hospital rating systems aggregate some of the quality measures included in our study to produce a composite score; however, hospitals that were top-ranked by such systems were scattered across our visualization, indicating that these top-ranked hospitals actually excel in many different ways. Our application of a novel graph analytics method to data describing U.S. hospitals revealed nuanced differences in performance that are obscured in existing hospital rating systems.
Highlights
Hospital performance can be characterized by an increasingly broad array of quality measures
We produced a diffusion map of hospitals in the U.S that describes hospital performance profiles, thereby introducing an approach to precisely characterize hospital performance across a wide range of publicly-reported quality measures. This approach retains the nuances of similarities and differences in hospital performance across the range of quality measures
To do Describing the performance of U.S hospitals by applying big data analytics this, we developed a graph analytic, semi-supervised machine learning technique, guided by input from experts in quality measurement, to organize hospitals according to the totality of their performance on the full range of quality measures released by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Summary
Hospital performance can be characterized by an increasingly broad array of quality measures. The proliferation of these quality measures has given patients, policymakers and health care providers insight into many different domains of hospital quality, including patient experience, safety, care processes, and outcomes, such as mortality and readmission rates. A hospital that offers a highly-rated patient experience but has poor outcomes and a hospital in which patients rate the experience as poor but have good outcomes may both be classified as average performers even though their performance in these key domains of hospital quality are quite different
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.