Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DEAEK). Systematic review of clinical-effectiveness and safety

Abstract

ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review of the efficacy/effectiveness, safety and cost of Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) technique in patients with corneal endothelial failure. MethodsComprehensive literature search was conducted in the main biomedical databases from January to May 2012. ResultsFollowing a critical perusal of the total of 485 abstracts retrieved, 16 case series and one economic evaluation study were included. Corrected distance visual acuity and uncorrected distance visual acuity improved after treatment with DSAEK, attaining values of 0.6–0.8 and 0.5 respectively. The degree of post-DSAEK astigmatism was not significant with respect to baseline values. The main complications were graft dislocation-detachment (1.5–23%), primary failure (0–12%) and endothelial rejection (0.8–8.5%). ConclusionsIn Fuchs’ dystrophy and bullous keratopathy, data on the effectiveness of DSAEK indicate post-intervention improvement in uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity. Astigmatism arising after DSAEK was not significant. The most significant post-DSAEK complications are linked to the viability of the graft, with the most frequent complications being dislocation-detachment and, to a lesser extent, endothelial rejection. The studies that assess DSAEK are case series, and for the most part retrospective. The quality of this type of studies is both low and limited.