Abstract
ABSTRACT This article shows that Descartes’ ontological argument in Meditation V is needed to ground essential distinctions, particularly the mind/body distinction. It does this by tracing out Descartes’ distinction between two types of falsity, and therefore truth, and the implications for the claim that all clear and distinct ideas are true. Clear and distinct ideas are formally true insofar as they represent true and immutable natures (actual essences). I argue that Descartes’ ontological argument shows that existence is an essential property of God, rather than simply that God exists, a point supported by the potential objections Descartes himself raises. Insofar as God is perfect, God is unchangeable; insofar as existence is an essential property of God, God always exists. Insofar as God is the cause of true and immutable natures, the perfection and essential existence of God are necessary and sufficient to ground the real distinction between mind and body.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
