Abstract
Japanese and Indonesian seen from morphological typology is an agglutinative language in which the morphological processes are done by affixation, ie by adding prefixes, suffixes and infixes. While the basic sequence sentence structure has a SOV sequence pattern for Japanese and SVO for Indonesian language. The predicate filled by the verb is capable of binding arguments in constructing the clause structure, so that there are verbs with one, two and three arguments, it depends on the type of verb. This study is a preliminary study of Japanese and Indonesian derivative verbs: the study of linguistic typology. The Theory of Linguistic Typology is used to analyze the formation of Japanese and Indonesian derivative verbs in which the verb serves as the core of the predicate to bind the argument in constructing the clause structure. From the perspective of linguistic typology, the results of the analysis show that (1) the basic form of Japanese derivative verb formers are adjectives (keiyoushi) and noun verbs, whereas Indonesian derivative verbs are derived from adjectives, nouns and pre-categorical. (2) The Japanese derivation affixes joining the adjective (keiyoushi) are -める meru, -まるmaru, -がるgaru’, -むmu and which joins the noun verb is -するsuru. While the derivational affix of the Indonesian language that joined the nouns are meng-, ber-, ter-, ke-an, ber-an, ber-kan, per-, -i, per-i, per-kan, the affix that joins the adjective are meng-, ber-, ter-, ke-an, ber-an, ber-kan, per-, -kan, per-i, dan –i and the affixes that join the pre-categorical are meng-, ter-, ber-, ber-an, -i,-kan.
Highlights
This contrastive analysis aimed to describe the similarities and differences between the object under study, making it easier to understand both languages
From the perspective of linguistic typology, the results of the analysis show that (1) the basic form of Japanese derivative verb formers are adjectives and noun verbs, whereas Indonesian derivative verbs are derived from adjectives, nouns and pre-categorical
Indonesian derivative verbs derived from nouns mengendap, membahana terengah-engah. bersarung menggelegar berkilauan mendidih beperkara berkilat . berdetak. terharu tergelak bersinar-sinar melangkah berhenti terpompa berkilat. terpesona melayari, melubangi mengalami menganugerahkan kehujanan, kecopetan, beranggotakan menyutradai, peralat persenjatai, menelepon, berkebun c
Summary
This contrastive analysis aimed to describe the similarities and differences between the object under study, making it easier to understand both languages. This contrastive analysis is used to describe the characteristics of the language structure, ie Japanese and Indonesian languages which are the field of study of this research. Greenberg concludes that there are six basic typing patterns of sentence sequences: SVO, SOV, VSO, VOS, OSV, OVS. The typology of Japanese and Indonesian is different, both in terms of phrase structure and sentence structure. Japanese sentence pattern pattern has a sequence of SOV (Subject-Object-Predicate), while Indonesian language has SVO sequence pattern (Subject-Predicate-Object)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
