Abstract
Measurements of phytoplankton production typically involve short-term (3-6 hr) experiments; some means of conversion is then applied to the results to yield estimates of daily production. Several means of making such conversions are compared on the basis of carbon-14 experiments performed on three shallow, saline, eutrophic lakes. Day-long (12 hr) exposures tended grossly to underestimate the "true" daily production as measured by the cumulative results of consecutive short-term experiments. On the other hand, conversions based on half-day exposures and on radiation data were about equally effective, although both may involve uncertainties of at least 25 %. Conversion factors derived from short-term v. cumulative results varied seasonally and over even short periods of time, apparently in accord with variable biological and meteorological conditions. The accuracies of extrapolations based on these factors are fairly comparable, but to minimize errors short-term experiments should include the midday period when possible. An alternative would be to construct predictive models applicable to each lake as a separate entity, encompassing a wide range of conditions. For small lakes at least, general formulae and models are not likely to be effective.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.