Derivation of a measure of physiological multisystem dysregulation: Results from WHAS and health ABC

Abstract

IntroductionMultifactorial biological processes underpin dysregulation over several individual physiological systems. However, it is challenging to characterize and model this multisystemic dysregulation and its relationship with individual physiologic systems. We operationalized a theory-driven measure of multisystem dysregulation and empirically tested for measurement differences by key characteristics. MethodsWe used the Women's Health and Aging Studies (WHAS) I and II (N = 649), and the Health ABC study (N = 1515). Twelve biomarkers representing multiple systems including stress response (e.g., inflammation), endocrine system, and energy regulation were identified. A series of confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted to evaluate the interplay between physiological systems and underlying multisystem dysregulation. We evaluated convergent criterion validity of a score for multisystem dysregulation against the physical frailty phenotype, and predictive criterion validity with incidence of walking difficulty and mortality. ResultsA bifactor CFA, a model in which dysregulation of individual systems proceeds independently of generalized dysregulation, fit data well in WHAS (RMSEA: 0.019; CFI: 0.977; TLI: 0.961) and Health ABC (RMSEA: 0.047; CFI: 0.874; TLI: 0.787). The general dysregulation factor was associated with frailty (OR: 2.2, 95 % CI: 1.4, 3.5), and elevated risk of incident walking difficulty and mortality. Findings were replicated in Health ABC. DiscussionBiomarker data from two epidemiologic studies support the construct of multisystem physiological dysregulation. Results further suggest system-specific and system-wide processes have unique and non-overlapping contributions to dysregulation in biological markers.