Abstract
Objective To explore the quantitative adjustment of ablation index (AI) under different baseline impedance to achieve similar lesion dimensions. Methods (1) Keeping the AIs relatively constant, the lesion dimensions in different baseline impedances were studied. (2) According to Joule's law, Q = I2RT, keeping the current (I) unchanged, the powers corresponding to different baseline impedances can be obtained. Under different baseline impedances and corresponding powers, the swine hearts were ablated for 30 s in simulated human circumstances. The baseline impedances, the lesion dimensions, and AIs were recorded. And the derivation of empirical formula was achieved according to the AIs and baseline impedance values in similar lesions dimension. (3) Basic AI and baseline impedance (AI0/R0) were set as 400/120 Ω in the common AI groups and 550/120 Ω in the high AI groups, AI values in different baseline impedances were calculated using the empirical formula, and the corresponding lesion dimensions were measured to verify this formula. Results (1) Higher baseline impedances were related to smaller lesion dimensions at similar AIs. (2) The lesion dimensions were roughly the same after modulating the baseline impedance and power to keep the electric current relatively constant. The relationship between AI and R fitted with experimental data is AI = 1.9933R + 203.61 (r = 0.9649), and the formula derived is ΔAI = (AI0 − 203)/R0 × ΔR. (3) Under the guidance of the empirical formula, there was no significant difference in lesion dimensions between the standard group and the formula guiding groups when AI0 = 400, but there was a shrinking tendence when AI > 700. Conclusion The lesion depths are negatively correlated with baseline impedance at a certain AI. The relationship between baseline impedance and AI is “ΔAI = (AI0 − 203)/R0 × ΔR”. It is verified that when the AI is not too high, the empirical formula can be used to guide the quantitative adjustment of AIs at different baseline impedance, and the lesion depths achieved are roughly the same.
Highlights
Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation has become one of the important treatments for atrial fibrillation (AF), recurrence after ablation of AF is common [1, 2]
Conclusion. e lesion depths are negatively correlated with baseline impedance at a certain ablation index (AI). e relationship between baseline impedance and AI is “ΔAI (AI0 − 203)/R0 × ΔR”
It is verified that when the AI is not too high, the empirical formula can be used to guide the quantitative adjustment of AIs at different baseline impedance, and the lesion depths achieved are roughly the same
Summary
Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation has become one of the important treatments for atrial fibrillation (AF), recurrence after ablation of AF is common [1, 2]. Ere is a close relationship between the lesion dimensions and the ablation success, recurrence, the perioperative complications. The prediction and control of lesion dimensions are of great significance in improving RF ablation efficacy and safety. E tissue damage caused by RF ablation includes resistive-heating damage and conductive-heating damage [4]. It has been reported that the RF lesion was associated with RF time, contact force, and applied power, which were integrated into ablation index (AI) and force-time integral (FTI) [5]. When RF ablation is performed in power-controlled mode in clinical practice, AI is most commonly used to predict the lesion dimensions [5], but the impedance is not counted in the AI calculation formula
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.