Abstract
Does bank deregulation enhance bank stability or exacerbate bank fragility? Consensus about the answers to this question remain elusive as theoretical and empirical studies arrive at disparate conclusions. We utilize the natural experiment offered by banking deregulation at the state level in the U.S. to examine this question. We find strong evidence that deregulation enhances bank stability by lowering bank failures. Intra-state deregulation lowers bank failures–primarily in the sixteen unit-banking states–by generating benefits from portfolio diversification, operating efficiencies and reduced loan losses. In contrast, inter-state deregulation had no effect on bank failures. Pre-existing bank failures in a state did not determine its timing of deregulation, which assures against reverse causal effects. In falsification tests, we find no effect of the deregulation on thrift failures. Our results have important implications for the regulation of the banking sector.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.