Abstract

Reef-accretion rate was measured in 151 core intervals from 12 Caribbean and western Atlantic locations. Palaeowater depth for each core interval was determined by comparing its position to the curve of Lighty et al. (1982), based on calendar years before 1950. While the majority of the data points fell within the upper 15 m of the water column, no clear depth-related pattern of reef accretion emerged. This is in sharp contrast to the widely held assumption that reef accretion will decrease exponentially with water depth at rates approximately an order of magnitude below the corresponding rates of coral growth at the same depths. Similarly, reef-accretion rates from facies dominated by branching Acropora palmata (3.83 m kyr –1 ) versus those associated with massive corals (3.07 m kyr –1 ) were not signifi cantly different ( = 0.05), owing to high variance across all water depths. Reef accretion showed a tendency to increase at higher rates of sea-level rise, but that relationship was also non-signifi cant. It is proposed that the known depth-related decrease in carbonate production may be offset by a parallel drop in bioerosion. While available data generally support this hypothesis, quantitative verifi cation must await careful measurements of both biological degradation and transport along a depth gradient. Nevertheless, bioerosion appears to not only play an important role in creating reef fabric, but to perhaps affect patterns of reef accretion as much as initial calcifi cation. Regardless of the cause, the patterns revealed by this study fl y in the face of the assumptions that underlie our most widely accepted Holocene reef models. Clearly new ones are needed that emphasize the varying contribution of biological material to what is largely a process of physical aggradation – in short reef corals grow, coral reefs accrete.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call