Abstract

Scar and vulnerability models assert that increased psychopathology may predict subsequent executive functioning (EF) deficits (and vice versa) over protracted timescales, yet most prior work on this topic has been cross-sectional. Thus, we tested the within- and between-person relations between EF, depression, and anxiety. Older adult participants (n=856) were assessed across four waves, approximately 2years apart. Performance-based EF and caregiver-rated symptom measures were administered. Bivariate latent change score and random-intercept cross-lagged panel models were conducted. Within persons, random-intercept cross-lagged panel models revealed that prior greater depression forecasted lower subsequent EF, and vice versa (d=-0.292 vs. -0.292). Bivariate dual latent change score models showed that within-person rise in depression predicted EF decreases, and vice versa (d=-0.245 vs. -0.245). No within-person, cross-lagged, EF-anxiety relations emerged. Further, significant negative between-person EF-symptom relations were observed (d=-0.264 to -0.395). Prospective, within-person findings offer some evidence for developmental scar and vulnerability models.

Highlights

  • Scar and vulnerability models assert that increased psychopathology may predict subsequent executive functioning (EF) deficits over protracted timescales, yet most prior work on this topic has been cross-sectional

  • This study aimed to examine the withinperson associations between a global EF composite and depression or anxiety severity using randomintercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPM) and bivariate dual latent change score models (BLCS) in older adults

  • The present study was a secondary analysis of the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study (ADAMS) publicly available and restricted-use datasets [63]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Scar and vulnerability models assert that increased psychopathology may predict subsequent executive functioning (EF) deficits (and vice versa) over protracted timescales, yet most prior work on this topic has been cross-sectional. We tested the within- and betweenperson relations between EF, depression, and anxiety. Bivariate latent change score and random-intercept cross-lagged panel models were conducted. Random-intercept cross-lagged panel models revealed that prior greater depression forecasted lower subsequent EF, and vice versa (d = À0.292 vs À0.292). Bivariate dual latent change score models showed that within-person rise in depression predicted EF decreases, and vice versa (d = À0.245 vs À0.245). Significant negative between-person EF-symptom relations were observed (d = À0.264 to À0.395). Prospective, within-person findings offer some evidence for developmental scar and vulnerability models

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call