Abstract
Abstract This study compares the deposition and oxidation behavior of two oxide-dispersed CoNiCrAlY powders, one commercially obtained, the other prepared in a high-energy attrition ball mill using CoNiCrAlY and nanosize α-alumina powders. The custom powder was deposited by HVOF spraying using two sets of parameters, one optimized for CoNiCrAlY powder, the other for fine alumina. Coatings produced under the latter conditions were found to be porous, which can be attributed to a low degree of melting in the dispersed alumina. Isothermal oxidation testing at 1373 K for up to 1000 h in air caused oxidation not only at the surface, but also inside the coatings due to the movement of oxygen through the pores. The coatings deposited under the other set of parameters, i.e., at higher power levels, were free of pores. Isothermal oxidation tests were also carried out on coatings produced from the commercial powder, in this case, by HVOF and as well as vacuum plasma spraying. The coatings obtained by HVOF spraying were found to have a thinner thermally grown oxide layer than not only the VPS coatings, but also conventional metallic bond coats. Internal oxidation in the HVOF coatings is due to insufficient cohesion of the spray particles. Furnace cycling tests were conducted on specimens with an additional ceramic thermal barrier coating. Specimens with VPS bond coats produced from commercial oxide-dispersed powder achieved almost same number of cycles to delamination as specimens with conventional metal bond coats.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have