Abstract
ABSTRACT On the ninth of August, 2020, mass protests broke out across Belarus following the undemocratic election of Alyaksandr Lukashenka. Lukashenka responded swiftly to the protests with extreme violence and repression, and as the protest movement, led by Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, called for the EU to intervene, the EU’s response was notably restrained. In the context of the EU’s values-centred articulation of its subjectivity, as a normative power that has a responsibility to the world beyond its own borders, this discrepancy between articulation and praxis raises questions about the current state of normative power in EU foreign policy discourses. This article will draw on Ernesto Laclau, Aletta Norval, and Jenny Edkins to investigate the discursive structures that construct the EU’s subjectivity as a foreign policy actor in the crisis in Belarus, discuss the meaning of articulating the crisis as a ‘women’s movement’, and explore how the EU justifies its chosen response in relation to the severity of the crisis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.