Abstract

Background. Personal protective equipment (PPE) is worn by military personnel to protect from combat trauma. War films may not represent PPE accurately, even when considered realistic. There is a risk that the subtle influence of films may subvert the understanding of PPE amongst military personnel and civilians. Methods. An observational study compared the depiction of PPE within popular war films to real-life. Films were included if they depicted land-based warfare. Depiction of helmets, body armour, eye protection, gloves, combat boots and hearing protection was compared to benchmarks. Trends in PPE over time were analysed using linear regression. Results. There were 73 combat scenes viewed from 16 films. Combat boots were the most depicted (72 scenes; 99%); hearing protection was the least (two scenes; 3%). There were statistically significant differences in PPE adherence between real life and films for all items of PPE (p < 0.05), except for combat boots (p = 0.621). There were improvements over time for all PPE except for hearing protection. Conclusions. PPE adherence in modern war films is poor, but has improved over time. There is a hypothetical risk that this has a negative impact on perceptions by both civilians and military personnel.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call