Abstract

This paper focuses on proposing the minimum number of storms necessary to derive the extreme flood hydrographs accurately through event-based modelling. To do so, we analyzed the results obtained by coupling a continuous stochastic weather generator (the Advanced WEather GENerator) with a continuous distributed physically-based hydrological model (the TIN-based real-time integrated basin simulator), and by simulating 5000 years of hourly flow at the basin outlet. We modelled the outflows in a basin named Peacheater Creek located in Oklahoma, USA. Afterwards, we separated the independent rainfall events within the 5000 years of hourly weather forcing, and obtained the flood event associated to each storm from the continuous hourly flow. We ranked all the rainfall events within each year according to three criteria: Total depth, maximum intensity, and total duration. Finally, we compared the flood events obtained from the continuous simulation to those considering the N highest storm events per year according to the three criteria and by focusing on four different aspects: Magnitude and recurrence of the maximum annual peak-flow and volume, seasonality of floods, dependence among maximum peak-flows and volumes, and bivariate return periods. The main results are: (a) Considering the five largest total depth storms per year generates the maximum annual peak-flow and volume, with a probability of 94% and 99%, respectively and, for return periods higher than 50 years, the probability increases to 99% in both cases; (b) considering the five largest total depth storms per year the seasonality of flood is reproduced with an error of less than 4% and (c) bivariate properties between the peak-flow and volume are preserved, with an error on the estimation of the copula fitted of less than 2%.

Highlights

  • Distributed physically-based hydrological models (DHMs) appeared in the 1960s and have been the object of critics due to their complexity and difficulty of use [1]

  • The objective is to propose a criterion for the selection of the minimum number of Figure 1 presents a general scheme of the modelling framework and methodology proposed: storm events per year to guarantee a correct derivation of the bivariate flood frequency curve, according to the following characteristics:

  • We analyzed the ability of the weather generator (AWE-GEN) to reproduce rainfall extremes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Distributed physically-based hydrological models (DHMs) appeared in the 1960s and have been the object of critics due to their complexity and difficulty of use [1]. The availability of higher resolution spatio-temporal datasets, the appearance of high performance computers, and the development of parallel-computing [2,3,4,5] have opened the possibility of using these models for large size basins and long-term hydrological continuous simulations. Challenges such as the influence of land-use changes [6,7] or the impact of climate change [8,9] on the involved hydrological processes can be analyzed with these approaches. Several methods can be applied and are mainly classified according to two main groups: Statistical flood frequency analysis, and derived flood frequency (DFF)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call