Abstract

Dependence assessment, which is to assess the influence of the operator’s failure of a task on the failure probability of subsequent tasks, is an important part in Human reliability analysis (HRA). The technique for human error rate prediction (THERP) has been widely applied to assess the dependence in HRA. However, due to the complexity of the real world, various kinds of uncertainty could occur in dependence assessment problem, and how to properly express and deal with uncertainty especially interval uncertainty remains a pressing issue. In this article, a novel method based on the interval evidential reasoning (IER) algorithm is proposed to assess dependence in HRA under interval uncertainty. First, dependence influential factors are identified and their functional relationship is determined. Then, judgments on these factors provided by the analysts are represented using interval belief distributions. Next, the interval evidential reasoning algorithm is employed to aggregate interval belief distributions of different factors according to their functional relationship while considering the credibility of the interval belief distribution. Finally, the conditional human error probability (CHEP) is calculated based on the fused interval belief distribution, where the upper and lower values are determined by assigning belief degree to the highest and lowest grade of the corresponding grade interval, respectively. Two numerical examples demonstrate that the proposed method not only properly deals with interval uncertainty using interval belief distribution and IER algorithm, but also provides a novel and effective way for dependence assessment in HRA.

Highlights

  • Aims to quantify human’s contribution to the system risk for a given task and provide recommendations in improving the reliability of the task, human reliability analysis (HRA) is a crucial part of the probability safety assessment (PSA) of large-scale complex systems as the human error has attracted increasing attention in the design and risk assessment of complex systems

  • A dependence assessment for human reliability analysis based on the interval evidential reasoning algorithm is proposed

  • The interval evidential reasoning algorithm is applied to aggregate interval belief distributions of different factors and obtain the final interval belief distribution

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Aims to quantify human’s contribution to the system risk for a given task and provide recommendations in improving the reliability of the task, human reliability analysis (HRA) is a crucial part of the probability safety assessment (PSA) of large-scale complex systems as the human error has attracted increasing attention in the design and risk assessment of complex systems. Current researches mainly use the pignistic probability function to evenly distribute the belief on the grade intervals to separate grades and the obtained CHEP is a precise value, which in some way ignores the interval uncertainty and could impact the reliability and accuracy of the result. To this end, a novel dependence assessment based on the interval evidential reasoning (IER) algorithm, which is developed by [33] and has been used in several decisionmaking problems under interval uncertainty [34]–[37], is proposed to deal with interval uncertainty in this paper.

INTERVAL BELIEF DISTRIBUTION
CASE STUDY
EXAMPLE 1
EXAMPLE 2
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call