Abstract

The Free Senior High School (aka. FSHS) policy of the Ghana government has attracted views from both critics and supporters. The objective for this investigation was to examine the deontological ethics of the FSHS educational policy leadership within the framework of utilitarianism-it is as a “duty” and for “public good”. Critics are questioning the policy leadership, intentionality, feasibility, and sustainability. Supporters are also defending the FSHS as a timely social intervention, for equitable access, and the ability of the national economy to afford by re-strategizing government priorities, national indebtedness, and the entire school management system. The research design was exploratory mixed method using a sample study (N=55) that came from six schools (students, head teachers, teachers, and parents) in one region. Data were analysed under the themes: perceptions, benefits, and challenges. Responses showed that the FSHS seems to be a natural progression from the FCUBE policy that is hailed as successful by the international donors. Respondents confirmed the benefits derived from the FSHS policy as altruistic. The discussions followed the theory of ethical deontology, policy leadership implications, democratization of education in Ghana, and the utilitarian concept for future national development. Recommendations include the Government of Ghana (GoG) should ensure “fitness” and “rightness” to align with national priorities in the economy. Secondly, GoG should fight against corruption and “noise” in the FSHS implementation system. Thirdly, the GoG should consider cost sharing and decentralization of education provision in Ghana. Policy makers (legistrators) should ensure that the education system recognizes Ghanaian children as deserving better quality and the incommensurability of values of Education for All.

Highlights

  • Ghana has always been in the forefront of implementing international agreements on education and poverty reduction agreements as an effort to bring about equity and social justice interventions (Bell, 1997)

  • The 15 interviewees gave a comprehensive raw data to be analysed on the three thematic areas: (i) perception of the Free Senior High School (FSHS) policy, (ii) benefits of the FSHS policy to the students/or parents, and (iii) challenges of the policy pertaining to sustainability

  • 4.1 RQ1: What Are the Perceptions of Beneficiaries of This FSHS Policy in Terms of Their Secondary Education? This question was to find out how beneficiaries perceive this policy for it to support a claim of deontological distinction in the act of utilitarianism

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ghana has always been in the forefront of implementing international agreements on education and poverty reduction agreements as an effort to bring about equity and social justice interventions (Bell, 1997). The present Government of Ghana (GoG) under the leadership of President Nana Akufo-Addo has taken a bold decision to implement the party’s flagship campaign promise of providing a free secondary education for all Ghanaians dabbed Free Senior High School (FSHS). It has been implemented since the academic year 2017/2018. The President said that he is prepared to re-align national budgetary allocations, setting our national priorities right, in an effort to finance Free SHS in Ghana (Presidential Speech, 2017) for the benefits of future generations of SHS students In effect, this resonates a “call to duty”, an “obligation” to citizens; this is deontological based on an action which is judged “rightness” rather than consequence. The following questions are raised for discussions: (1) What are the perceptions of beneficiaries of this FSHS policy in terms of their secondary education? (2) Do beneficiaries’ views support any claim of deontological distinction in the act of utilitarianism?

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.