Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the Herbst appliance on the proclination and protrusion of the lower incisors, and to verify if the device causes alveolar bone loss in the anterior region of the mandible. This is a retrospective study. The sample consisted of 35 individuals. The treatment group consisted of 22 individuals (8 girls and 14 boys; initial mean age of 8.2 years) who used the Cantilever Herbst appliance for a period of 12 months. The control group consisted of 13 individuals (3 girls and 10 boys; initial mean age of 8.9 years) who received no treatment and were followed up for a period of approximately 18 months. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were performed at the beginning and at the end of the observational period. The medullary bone thickness (MT), buccal cortical bone thickness (BCT), lingual cortical bone thickness (LCT), and lower incisors proclination and protrusion were evaluated. Data were submitted to statistical analysis (ANCOVA and Student's t-test) with a significance level of 5%. There was no significant difference in MT, BCT, LCT and incisor proclination between groups. Incisor proclination increased in the treated group with no statistical significance. The treatment group showed a significant increase in the protrusion of the incisors (p = 0.02). The Herbst appliance promoted a small proclination and protrusion of the lower incisors, without relevant clinical implications. The Herbst appliance did not cause bone loss in the anterior region of the mandible during Class II treatment.

Highlights

  • Class II malocclusion is highly prevalent worldwide

  • A mean reduction of 0.31 mm was observed in the protrusion of lower incisors of the control group and a mean increase of 1.11 mm was found in the treatment group, a significant between-group difference (p = 0.02)

  • A concern of using cone beam CBCT in alveolar bone studies relates to the size of the voxel for image acquisition [20,21,22]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Class II malocclusion is highly prevalent worldwide. Its etiology is multifactorial, being caused by skeletal or dental factors, or their combination. One of the common causes of Class II malocclusion is mandibular retrognathism [1]. The Herbst appliance promotes a postural alteration in the mandible, positioning it anteriorly. It consists of a reciprocal intermaxillary anchor intraoral device. The device action of advancing the mandible causes an equal and opposite reaction in the upper arch. The appliance produces a forward force on the lower teeth (action) and a backward force on the upper teeth (reaction) [2]. Some of the effects of the Herbst appliance are improvement in the maxillomandibular sagittal relationship, increase in condylar growth and mandibular length, protrusion and proclination of the lower incisors, retrusion and retroclination of the upper incisors [2,3,4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call