Abstract

Introduction The aim of the study is to determine the effects of different vertical force vectors acting on dentoalveolar and soft tissues while applying a retraction force using various anchorage sources and their effects on these tissues. Material andmethods Based on the selection criteria, a total of 35 patient case records with Angle's Class I bidental malocclusion and incompetent lips treated with four premolar extractions were included. Retraction was achieved using a NiTi coil spring with two different force vectors. The anchorage in group 1 was enhanced by a transpalatal arch (TPA)and Lower Stabilizing Arch(LSA) in the upper and lower arch, respectively, with a force vector parallel to the occlusal plane,whereas in group 2, the force vector using Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) was 15 - 20 degrees to the occlusal plane. The skeletal, dental, and soft tissue were obtained using 40 parameters. Intra-group comparisons between pre- and post-treatment records were conducted using a paired t-test, while inter-group comparisons were conducted using an independent t-test. Result Significant anchor loss was observed in group 1, indicated by mesial movement of molar crowns by (-2.10±0.50) in the maxillary arch and (-1.75±0.38) in the mandibular arch. Distal movement of incisors following premolar extractions with both studied force vectors resulted in an improvement in lip procumbency and incisor inclinations, without any significant skeletal changes.Molar mesial movement was observed in subjects treated with conventional anchorage. Conclusion En masse anterior retraction did lead to anchorage loss when carried out without TADs.Altering the force vector did not produce significant changes in tooth movement along the vertical plane.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call