Abstract

ObjectivesDeciding when cuspal coverage is needed for posterior teeth is considered a challenge for dentists. The aims were to assess dentists' decision making regarding the need for cuspal coverage for vital teeth (VT) and endodontically treated teeth (ETT) with varying amounts of tooth structure loss and to identify clinical situations of dissimilarity and uncertainty in decision making.Materials and MethodsA random sample of 182 dentists were invited to participate in the survey. The survey included photos of 13 posterior teeth: six VT and seven ETT. The clinical situations selected were based on a hypothetical scale of typodont teeth with ascending amounts of tooth structure loss. A brief description of each situation was provided. Each dentist was asked to decide whether cuspal coverage is needed, not needed, or unsure. Descriptive analyses using SPSS were conducted. Seventy‐five percent was chosen as a cutoff point for assessing similarity in decision making. The unsure answer reflected uncertainty. Associations were assessed using chi‐square test.ResultsOne hundred twenty dentists participated (65.9% response rate, 70 females). Median for years of experience was 3.5 (interquartile range 1.1–10.8). Analyses revealed a similarity percentage of <75% in decision making among dentists for six clinical situations: four VT and two ETT. More similarity was observed for situations at both ends of the scale with minimal and severe amounts of tooth structure loss and more for ETT than for VT. The highest percentages of uncertainty were more for VT than for ETT. Clinical conditions of VT were more likely to receive the “not sure” decision compared with those of ETT (χ 2, P < .001). No association was detected with gender (χ 2, P = .509) or years of experience (χ 2, P = .223).ConclusionsDissimilarity and uncertainty in deciding when cuspal coverage is needed were observed especially for VT and teeth with a moderate amount of structure loss.

Highlights

  • Decision making regarding the best management for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) and vital teeth (VT) can be challenging for dentists (Cheung, 2005; Morgano, Hashem, Fotoohi, & Rose, 1994; Robbins, 1990; Zarow, Devoto, & Saracinelli, 2009)

  • Deciding whether a tooth would best be restored with cuspal coverage or an intracoronal restoration will depend on many factors such as whether the tooth is endodontically treated or not (Afrashtehfar & Tamimi, 2017; Aquilino & Caplan, 2002), the amount and distribution of tooth structure remaining (Afrashtehfar, Ahmadi, et al, 2017; Afrashtehfar, Emami, et al, 2017; Nagasiri & Chitmongkolsuk, 2005), the type and amount of load applied on the tooth during function (Loney, Moulding, & Ritsco, 1995; Torbjörner & Fransson, 2004), the parafunctional habits of the patient (Nishigawa, Bando, & Nakano, 2001), the esthetic value of the tooth, and the knowledge and experience of the dentist (Burke & Lucarotti, 2009; Lucarotti, Holder, & Burke, 2005a)

  • The analyses revealed a percentage of ≥75% in making the same decision for seven clinical situations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Decision making regarding the best management for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) and vital teeth (VT) can be challenging for dentists (Cheung, 2005; Morgano, Hashem, Fotoohi, & Rose, 1994; Robbins, 1990; Zarow, Devoto, & Saracinelli, 2009). Deciding whether a tooth would best be restored with cuspal coverage or an intracoronal restoration will depend on many factors such as whether the tooth is endodontically treated or not (Afrashtehfar & Tamimi, 2017; Aquilino & Caplan, 2002), the amount and distribution of tooth structure remaining (Afrashtehfar, Ahmadi, et al, 2017; Afrashtehfar, Emami, et al, 2017; Nagasiri & Chitmongkolsuk, 2005), the type and amount of load applied on the tooth during function (Loney, Moulding, & Ritsco, 1995; Torbjörner & Fransson, 2004), the parafunctional habits of the patient (Nishigawa, Bando, & Nakano, 2001), the esthetic value of the tooth, and the knowledge and experience of the dentist (Burke & Lucarotti, 2009; Lucarotti, Holder, & Burke, 2005a). The loss of a protective feedback mechanism in the ETT could be a contributor to the increased loads on ETT, which could lead to an increase in the risk of fracture. It could be argued that the protective feedback mechanism comes from the proprioceptive receptors in the periodontal ligament (Randow & Glantz, 1986)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call