Abstract

Extensive oral processing of food through dental occlusion and orbital mandibular movement is often cited as a uniquely mammalian trait that contributed to their evolutionary success. Save for mandibular translation, these adaptations are not seen in extant archosaurs or lepidosaurs. In contrast, some ornithischian dinosaurs show evidence of precise dental occlusion, habitual intraoral trituration and complex jaw motion. To date, however, a robust understanding of the diversity of jaw mechanics within non-avian dinosaurs, and its comparison with other vertebrates, remains unrealized. Large dental batteries, well-developed dental wear facets, and robust jaws suggests that neoceratopsian (horned) dinosaurs were capable chewers. But, biomechanical analyses have assumed a relatively simple, scissor-like (orthal) jaw mechanism for these animals. New analyses of dental microwear, presented here, show curvilinear striations on the teeth of Leptoceratops. These features indicate a rostral to caudal orbital motion of the mandible during chewing. A rostrocaudal mandibular orbit is seen in multituberculates, haramiyid allotherians, and some rodents, and its identification in Leptoceratops gracilis is the first evidence of complex, mammal-like chewing in a ceratopsian dinosaur. The term circumpalinal is here proposed to distinguish this new style of chewing from other models of ceratopsian mastication that also involve a palinal component. This previously unrecognized complexity in dinosaurian jaw mechanics indicates that some neoceratopsian dinosaurs achieved a mammalian level of masticatory efficiency through novel adaptive solutions.

Highlights

  • Mastication, or chewing, is the process by which food items are broken down between precisely occluding teeth via repeated mandibular adduction (Hiiemae, 2000)

  • Mounting evidence indicates that the distribution of chewing is more widespread in non-mammalian synapsids (Crompton & Hotton, 1967; Crompton, 1972; Crompton & Attridge, 1986; King, Oelofsen & Rubidge, 1989; King, 1990; King, 1996; Cox, 1998; Angielczyk, 2004) and sauropsid amniotes than previously thought (Weishampel, 1984; Norman & Weishampel, 1985; Rybczynski & Vickaryous, 2001; How to cite this article Varriale (2016), Dental microwear reveals mammal-like chewing in the neoceratopsian dinosaur Leptoceratops gracilis

  • Because neoceratopsian skulls lack intracranial joints with large gaps (Holliday & Witmer, 2008), and have a simple hinge-like jaw mechanism, biomechanical analyses of their chewing infer an unsophisticated orthal motion that resulted in a scissor-like adduction of the lower jaw (Ostrom, 1964; Ostrom, 1966; Tanoue et al, 2009)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mastication, or chewing, is the process by which food items are broken down between precisely occluding teeth via repeated mandibular adduction (Hiiemae, 2000). Because neoceratopsian skulls lack intracranial joints with large gaps (Holliday & Witmer, 2008), and have a simple hinge-like jaw mechanism, biomechanical analyses of their chewing infer an unsophisticated orthal motion that resulted in a scissor-like (orthal) adduction of the lower jaw (Ostrom, 1964; Ostrom, 1966; Tanoue et al, 2009)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call