Abstract

Dental data are used to test two hypotheses as to whether the “eastern” traits of the Mesolithic and Neolithic populations of the Russian Plain are due to Mongoloid admixture or to evolutionary conservatism, specifi cally to the retention of features peculiar to the Upper Paleolithic groups. Frequencies of nonmetric traits, both those used in standard population studies and so-called markers of generalized conservatism, were studied in dental samples from Yuzhny Oleniy Ostrov and Vasilyevka-3 (Mesolithic), Fomino (Ryazan variant of Pit-Comb Ware culture), Karavaikha (Kargopol variant of the same culture), Vovnigi-1 (Kiev-Cherkassy variant of the Neolithic Dnieper-Donets culture), and Vovnigi-2 (Azov-Dnieper variant of the same culture). Published dental data on Zvejnieki (Mesolithic Kunda cuture), Yasinovatka and Nikolskoye (Dnieper-Donets culture), Sakhtysh-2a (Lyalovo variant of the Neolithic Pit-Comb Ware culture), and Upper Paleolithic samples from Europe were used for comparison. Both A.A. Zubov’s standard protocol and C.G. Turner’s ASUDAS were employed. The results suggest that multiple evolutionary processes were involved. Northeastern European Mesolithic dentitions indicate both Mongoloid admixture and continuity with Upper Paleolithic groups. Mesolithic series from Ukraine are more specialized in the Caucasoid direction while also showing certain Upper Paleolithic traits. In the Neolithic, the dental differences between northern and southern Caucasoids decrease, and there is a gradual reduction of both Mongoloid and Upper Paleolithic characteristics. Nonetheless, people of the Pit-Comb Ware culture, like those of Dnieper-Donets culture display certain Upper Paleolithic traits, which are the most evident in Vovnigi-2.

Highlights

  • Dental data are used to test two hypotheses as to whether the “eastern” traits of the Mesolithic and Neolithic populations of the Russian Plain are due to Mongoloid admixture or to evolutionary conservatism, to the retention of features peculiar to the Upper Paleolithic groups

  • Frequencies of nonmetric traits, both those used in standard population studies and so-called markers of generalized conservatism, were studied in dental samples from Yuzhny Oleniy Ostrov and Vasilyevka-3 (Mesolithic), Fomino (Ryazan variant of Pit-Comb Ware culture), Karavaikha (Kargopol variant of the same culture), Vovnigi-1

  • Published dental data on Zvejnieki (Mesolithic Kunda cuture), Yasinovatka and Nikolskoye (Dnieper-Donets culture), Sakhtysh-2a (Lyalovo variant of the Neolithic PitComb Ware culture), and Upper Paleolithic samples from Europe were used for comparison

Read more

Summary

Методы исследования

В задачи исследования входила проверка двух гипотез: о наличии в составе мезолитического или неолитического населения лесной полосы Восточно-Европейской равнины монголоидного суперстрата и о присутствии здесь протоморфного антропологического компонента, связанного с населением эпохи верхнего палеолита. До н.э., коллекция МАЭ РАН No 5773) и Васильевки-3 в Днепровском регионе (коллекция МАЭ РАН No 6462); неолитические из могильников Черная Гора (Фомино) рязанской культуры общности с ямочно-гребенчатой керамикой Они были обследованы как по стандартной программе, так и по программе учета маркеров архаики В качестве дополнительных источников информации использовались мезолитическая серия из могильника Звейниеки в Латвии, неолитические выборки из могильников Днепровского надпорожья (Ясиноватка, Никольское), относящиеся к днепро-донецкой культурной общности, и серия льяловской неолитической культуры общности с ямочно-гребенчатой керамикой (Сахтыш-2а). В качестве эталонного комплекса, по отношению к которому анализировалась динамика частот одонтологических признаков, были взяты суммарные характеристики верхнепалеолитических находок Костёнки XIV, XV, XVIII и Сунгирь 2, 3 Дополнительно привлекались опубликованные данные, суммарно характеризующие население зарубежной Европы ранней и поздней поры верхнего палеолита [Manni, Vargiu, Coppa, 2007] (табл. 3)

Результаты и обсуждение
Редукция гипоконуса
Центральный бугорок
Список литературы
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.