Abstract

Brown bears are known to use rubbing behavior as a means of chemical communication, but the function of this signaling is unclear. One hypothesis that has gained support is that male bears rub to communicate dominance to other males. We tested the communication of dominance hypothesis in a low-density brown bear population in southeast British Columbia. We contrasted rubbing rates for male and female bears during and after the breeding season using ten years of DNA-mark-recapture data for 643 individuals. Here we demonstrate that male brown bears rub 60% more during the breeding than the non-breeding season, while female rubbing had no seasonal trends. Per capita rub rates by males were, on average, 2.7 times higher than females. Our results suggest that the function of rubbing in the Rocky Mountains may not only be to communicate dominance, but also to self-advertise for mate attraction. We propose that the role of chemical communication in this species may be density-dependent, where the need to self-advertise for mating is inversely related to population density and communicating for dominance increases with population density. We suggest that future endeavors to elucidate the function of rubbing should sample the behavior across a range of population densities using camera trap and genotypic data.

Highlights

  • Chemical communication within and amongst species can provide direct fitness benefits by reducing predation risk [1,2], competition [3], physical conflict [4], and facilitating mate attraction [5]

  • Males rub marked on rub objects significantly more (p < 0.001, Fig 2) than female bears in both the breeding (RDS1000: Male = 5.5 ± 7.6 (SE); Female = 1.0 ± 7.7) and non-breeding seasons (RDS1000: Male = 3.3 ± 7.4; Female = 1.4 ± 7.4)

  • Our results suggest a modified interpretation of the communication of dominance hypothesis posited by Clapham et al (2012) for chemical signaling of brown bears, a non-territorial solitary carnivore

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Chemical communication within and amongst species can provide direct fitness benefits by reducing predation risk [1,2], competition [3], physical conflict [4], and facilitating mate attraction [5]. Brown bears (Ursus arctos) are known to chemically communicate by rubbing on trees, which can be sampled using non-invasive methods such as camera traps or genotyping of hairs left on the tree during rubbing [6,7,8]. Clapham et al (2012) [6] proposed and tested competing hypotheses on the function of chemical signaling among brown bears. Density-dependent grizzly bear communication funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call