Abstract

The regeneration of the former brownfields along the Aker River in Oslo over the last 20 years has been a realisation of heritage value as well as economic value. As a result of the intersection of these value sets, the reasons for valuation sometimes are mixed together and overlap. The heritage values emphasised seem to be based on aesthetic and economic considerations, and the heritage represented reflects what has been marketable at the various stages of development. This aesthetic and income-based valuation of heritage indicates a dynamic appreciation of heritage rather than a focus on materiality and age as qualities resisting change. Commodification of heritage qualities thus provides support for the elements prioritised, but at the same time makes them more exposed for being regarded less worthy and removed if they turn out less marketable at a later stage — the past for sale as an opportunity, but also as a threat.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call