Dense deposit disease: a greatly increased biopsy incidence in India versus the USA.

Abstract

BackgroundWe present the largest clinicopathologic case series to date of dense deposit disease (DDD) in an Indian population and compare the renal biopsy incidence rate to that seen in a large renal laboratory in USA.MethodsCases of DDD were identified and evaluated from native kidney biopsies reported at Renopath, India and at Arkana Laboratories, in the USA. Renopath receives biopsies from four states, located in the South and Eastern part of India. Arkana Laboratories’ biopsies came from 37 states across the USA.ResultsDuring the study period, there were a total of 25 patients diagnosed with DDD among the 7335 native kidney biopsies at Renopath. Thus, the biopsy incidence rate (cases of DDD/total renal biopsies/year) is 0.0034. By comparison, there were 10 cases of DDD diagnosed among 26 319 native kidney biopsies at Arkana Laboratories during the same time period, with a renal biopsy incidence rate of 0.00038.ConclusionsDDD in this Indian subpopulation has similar clinical and pathologic characteristics when compared to previously reported studies. However, the biopsy incidence rate is about 890% or 8.9 times more common in this subset of the Indian population when compared with a broad cross-section of the US population. In addition to potential genetic factors, environmental conditions and chronic infections likely contribute to the markedly higher biopsy incidence rate. Given the much greater number of patients with DDD in this population, further retrospective and prospective studies would allow more rapid progress in understanding the pathogenesis of DDD and thus potential treatment of patients with DDD.