Abstract

Within existing literature, scholars have most often examined Denis Diderot’s Salons in the contexts of art exhibitions and discourse. While the art world is an apt place to examine his works, this essay intends to broaden the scope of historical inquiry by situating his writing in the context of natural disasters. By approaching his Salons from outside the artistic milieu, I do not intend to imply that the circumstances of the eighteenth-century Parisian art world did not play a major role in Diderot’s work. It did, perhaps first and foremost. I am merely offering the idea that art criticism in France—and especially Diderot’s Salons—developed alongside a cultural consciousness of material durability. Writing about art offered a supplementary type of sustainability. It could conserve not only a literary description of the artwork but also the author’s distinctive experience of it. Diderot’s Salons make for an interesting case study, because his descriptions of art on display at the salon exhibitions are lengthier than any other art critical text written at the time and may lend insight, more broadly, into the power of writing as a tool for art conservation.

Highlights

  • When the eighteenth-century French philosopher Denis Diderot penned his nine manuscripts of art criticism from 1759 to 1781, known as his Salons, he frequently alluded to the fragility of art.[1]

  • By approaching his Salons from outside the artistic milieu, I add to existing scholarship by positing that art criticism in France—and especially Diderot’s Salons—developed alongside a cultural consciousness of material durability

  • While numerous scholars productively examine Diderot’s descriptions in relation to ekphrasis, few scholars have considered the physical longevity of ancient ekphrastic poems, which had survived in varying conditions and were widely duplicated by the eighteenth century

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When the eighteenth-century French philosopher Denis Diderot penned his nine manuscripts of art criticism from 1759 to 1781, known as his Salons, he frequently alluded to the fragility of art.[1].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call