Abstract
Abstract Chapter three outlines the key elements of a conceptual vocabulary of a historical ontological approach to jurisprudence, distinguishing between doctrinal discourse capable of being used to verbalize propositions of the law and ordinary-language discourse that can be used to articulate propositions about the law. With the first most closely connected to venues of administration and scientizing juristic speculation and the second the public sphere, the respective contribution of each type to constituting the law as a distinct kind of object (viz. ‘ontologizaton’) unfolded at different sites, even if ones that were separated by permeable barriers across which discursive elements could pass. After explicating the notion of ontologization, the chapter turns to a second key pair of elements of the conceptual vocabulary of a historical ontological approach to jurisprudence. These enable a distinction between doctrinal discourse’s qualities of operativeness and administrability.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
