Abstract

The growing interest in private equity means that allocators must carefully evaluate its risk and return. The challenge is that modeling private equity is not straightforward, due to a lack of good quality data and artificially smooth returns. We try to demystify the subject, considering theoretical arguments, historical average returns, and a forward-looking analysis. For institutional investors trying to calibrate their asset allocation decisions for private equity, we lay out a framework for expected returns, albeit one hampered by data limitations, that is based on a discounted cash-flow framework similar to what we use for public stocks and bonds. In particular, we attempt to assess private equity’s realized and estimated expected return edges over lower-cost public equity counterparts. Our estimates display a decreasing trend over time, which does not seem to have slowed the institutional demand for private equity. We conjecture that this is due to investors’ preference for the return-smoothing properties of illiquid assets in general. <b>TOPICS:</b>Private equity, performance measurement <b>Key Findings</b> • A leveraged small-cap public equity index may be a better benchmark for the performance of private equity than the large-cap indices generally used. Further, internal-rates-of-return (IRRs) can be especially misleading if they are compared against the time-weighted returns used for public market indices. • The smoothed returns of private equity understate the true economic risk and are an artifact of the lack of mark-to-market for illiquid assets. • The richening valuations of PE may be a headwind for future returns for the asset class, suggesting a slimmer edge over public equity than long-term averages.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call