Abstract
Literature cannot mirror gossip in any straightforward sense. Where gossip requires a dialogue and lacks an audience, literature tends to be the very opposite. Thomas Mann's Doktor Faustus, however, complicates this definition. Although the novel's biographical theme echoes gossip's character of scandalous revelation, the mode of narration also implicitly resembles the dialogic form of gossip. By destroying the authority of his biographical subject, manipulating the temporal distance between narrator, reader and subject, and by staging multiple performances on multiple fronts, Zeitblom constructs a ‘pseudo-dialogue’ with the reader, who succumbs to his oratorical prowess. This reading has more general repercussions for interpretations of Doktor Faustus. Mann spoke about the ‘secret’ of his protagonists' ‘identity’, and this essay proposes that both characters have Faustian pretensions, but that neither one is Doktor Faustus; rather, Adrian Leverkühn mirrors Gretchen, the naïve victim. Through historical allegory, Mann illustrates that literature is more useful as a mode of working through a traumatic past than as a representation of that past.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.