Abstract
This article critically reviews the Gilles Bataillon suggestive hypothesis for the study of the social process and the Sandinista phenomenon in Nicaragua. Although we cannot speak of dictatorship or totalitarianism, it is possible to find a religious imaginary and some medieval practices often posing as “originality” revolutionary. The Nicaraguan revolution from this point of view is different from the Cuban Revolution, mainly because the Central American country's longstanding oligarchy and the fact that the Catholic Church never ceased to play an important role. Nicaragua has remained in the past with a populist government in which several “social ages” coexist and a true modern synthesis has not yet been achieved.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
