Abstract
Host demography can alter the dynamics of infectious disease. In the case of perfectly immunizing infections, observations of strong sensitivity to demographic variation have been mechanistically explained through analysis of the susceptible–infected–recovered (SIR) model that assumes lifelong immunity following recovery from infection. When imperfect immunity is incorporated into this framework via the susceptible–infected–recovered–susceptible (SIRS) model, with individuals regaining full susceptibility following recovery, we show that rapid loss of immunity is predicted to buffer populations against the effects of demographic change. However, this buffering is contrary to the dependence on demography recently observed for partially immunizing infections such as rotavirus and respiratory syncytial virus. We show that this discrepancy arises from a key simplification embedded in the SIR(S) framework, namely that the potential for differential immune responses to repeat exposures is ignored. We explore the minimum additional immunological information that must be included to reflect the range of observed dependencies on demography. We show that including partial protection and lower transmission following primary infection is sufficient to capture more realistic reduced levels of buffering, in addition to changes in epidemic timing, across a range of partially and fully immunizing infections. Furthermore, our results identify key variables in this relationship, including R0.
Highlights
There is great diversity in the mechanisms by which pathogens interact with host immune systems and cause disease [1]
The functions representing the changing birth rate are depicted in figure 1a(i) and all parameter values are given in table 1
Why does the susceptible–infected– recovered (SIR)(S) framework capture observed buffering patterns relatively well for some partially immunizing infections but not for others? And what additional biological processes must be included in the model to improve predictions for these latter pathogens? We introduce a refined version of the SIRS model that incorporates a greater range of the spectrum of possible host immune responses by accounting for reduced susceptibility and infectiousness following primary exposure to the pathogen
Summary
There is great diversity in the mechanisms by which pathogens interact with host immune systems and cause disease [1]. For most pathogens the outcome is complex, as immunity can wane over time or provide only partial protection against reinfection [2,4]. One of the major challenges of applying theoretical disease models to these real dynamical systems is in incorporating sufficient biological information while retaining a parsimonious modelling framework [5]. Two of the most basic mathematical frameworks are the susceptible–infected– recovered (SIR) and susceptible–infected–recovered–susceptible (SIRS) models, which have been extensively studied in the epidemiological literature and provided many insights into the underlying dynamics of infectious diseases [6,7]. The SIR model assumes immunity is lifelong and the SIRS model assumes that once immunity has waned, individuals become entirely susceptible to reinfection
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
