Abstract

Jane Addams’s approach to responsibility deserves attention from contemporary theorists, largely because it is rooted in a pragmatist understanding of democracy. As a pragmatist, Addams stresses that democracy is a “rule of living,” not simply a set of political institutions. Democratically committed citizens, she argues, must share responsibility for harms arising from processes to which they are connected. They also must learn from and work with people whose experiences of these processes are different from their own. Not all of Addams’s ideas have stood the test of time. Still, her pragmatist approach to responsibility is superior to those of Iris Marion Young and Jean Bethke Elshtain. An exploration of Addams’s thought illuminates the limitations of Young’s separation of blame and character development from the theme of shared responsibility, and suggests that Elshtain’s understandings of character development will be unlikely to help citizens respond to problems that confront them.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.