Abstract

The article deals with the democratic state-legal regime in the light of the twenty-first century threats. It is noted that the presence of formal features of a democratic regime does not always ensure the functioning of such mechanisms and institutions of democracy as the division of power, freedom of speech and assembly, fair elections and others. The main internal and external destructive elements influencing both settled and developing liberal-democratic regimes are determined. Emphasis is placed on the destructive activities of the Russian Federation in destroying and discrediting the basic institutions of liberal democracies and popularizing the China model of an undemocratic state-legal regime. The influence of scientific and technological progress, political, social, economic, environmental and military factors on the transformation of liberal-democratic regimes and the world global order is revealed. The danger (for the whole liberal-democratic world in general and Ukraine in particular) of the use of such a phenomenon as "hybrid war" by the Russian Federation in the context of the spread of the fascist concept of "Russian world" is pointed out. It is proved that there is the need to preserve a liberal-democratic state-legal regime, as the most successful of all regimes offered to humanity, for future generations.

Highlights

  • The theory and philosophy of law defines the form of the state regime as a manner of exercising state power by certain methods

  • The purpose of the article is to determine the advantages of the liberal-democratic regime, to assess its current state and prospects for development

  • It is obvious that a comprehensive approach is needed to understand the causes of the crisis of democratic regimes and ways to get out of it

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The theory and philosophy of law defines the form of the state regime as a manner (order) of exercising state power by certain methods. A clear division of all states according to the form of state regime into democratic and undemocratic is established (Rabinovych, 2021). The struggle for world domination was waged by liberal-democratic (as the most progressive and widespread among democratic regimes), communist, and fascist (national socialist as its variety) regimes. After the collapse of the USSR as the main world leader of the communist regime in 1991, a proper international legal assessment of its criminal activities was not given, and it continued to exist in one form or another in some states (China, North Korea, Cuba). The idea has taken root in the world that the liberal-democratic regime remained the only viable mechanism for building a state of general peace and prosperity

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call