Abstract
Due to a lack of religious or metaphysical orientation in modern Western societies, interpersonal conflicts of interest and value are solved under the premise of individuals acting rationally through the interaction on a free market and the formation of political majorities gaining legislative power. However, the legitimacy of this approach becomes increasingly questionable when it comes to sustainability conflicts. In view of this, Hans Jonas considered the possibility of the need to suspend democratic institutions in favor of a benevolent tyrant to avert a potential catastrophe. Since any form of centralism comes with its own problems of legitimacy, utilizing the more modest orientation claims of prudence ethics is a more promising alternative in deliberations on the justifiability of an occasional suspension of the majority principle without exposing a society to the dangers of domineering arbitrariness.
Highlights
The example of sustainability conflictsDue to a lack of religious or metaphysical orientation in modern Western societies, interpersonal conflicts of interest and value are solved under the premise of individuals acting rationally through the interaction on a free market and the formation of political majorities gaining legislative power
Conflicts are nothing unusual for modern societies that can no longer rely on religious or metaphysical traditions to guide collective action
I demonstrated that sustainability conflicts are characterized by normative and epistemic uncertainties
Summary
Due to a lack of religious or metaphysical orientation in modern Western societies, interpersonal conflicts of interest and value are solved under the premise of individuals acting rationally through the interaction on a free market and the formation of political majorities gaining legislative power. Since any form of centralism comes with its own problems of legitimacy, utilizing the more modest orientation claims of prudence ethics is a more promising alternative in deliberations on the justifiability of an occasional suspension of the majority principle without exposing a society to the dangers of domineering arbitrariness. Deshalb ist die Operationalisierung der bescheideneren Orientierungsansprüche der Klugheitsethik eine erfolgversprechendere Alternative in Beratungen über die Rechtfertigbarkeit einer gelegentlichen Aufhebung des Mehrheitsprinzips, ohne dabei eine Gesellschaft den Gefahren herrschender Willkür auszusetzen.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have