Abstract
Kuwait’s Constitution defines the small Arab Gulf nation as a constitutional democracy led by a hereditary emirate, although outside observers have questioned the degree to which it is indeed democratic. Despite such scepticism, Kuwait has undoubtedly taken some steps to promote democratization, including the introduction of the Constitution and Human Rights (CHR) module to the national curriculum to teach high students about civics, democracy and rights. While previous studies have explored the perspectives of Kuwaiti students and teachers towards democracy in general and the CHR in particular, the perspectives of Kuwaiti politicians have not been previously explored. To better understand their perspectives of and experiences towards democracy and education for democracy, this study employed a phenomenological approach involving 15-to-30-minute semi-structured interviews with five Kuwait politicians who have served as either Members of the Kuwaiti National Assembly or Ministers or both. The themes that emerged included Active Versus Passive Democracy, Homegrown Versus Imported Democracy, Culture and Democracy and Education for Democracy, which are discussed in greater detail in the article.
Highlights
Many forms of Government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe
We have established two purposes of the research: (1) to understand how democracy is experienced in Kuwait and (2) to understand the perspectives of Kuwaiti politicians towards education for democracy in Kuwait
The limited previous research has focused on the perspectives of students and sometimes teachers [12] but until now no studies have investigated the perspectives of Kuwaiti politicians in terms of how they see democracy developing in Kuwait
Summary
Many forms of Government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. It has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time [1]. Among the many imperfections of democracy, Dahl [2] and Schmitter and Karl [3] noted how the democratic process is slow, indecisive, bureaucratic, inefficient, frustrating and even unstable at times.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
