Abstract
ObjectiveHome care (HC) has been promoted as an efficient alternative to residential care (RC). However, little is known about the individuals who receive HC. This study compared the cognitive and functional statuses of persons with dementia receiving HC or RC at the time of diagnosis with dementia. It was hypothesized that persons with dementia receiving RC would have declined further, both cognitively and functionally. Study designPopulation-based secondary data analysis. MethodsData from the Canadian Institute for Health Information's Continuing Care Reporting System and the Home Care Reporting System, 2009–2011, were used. Respective populations of 39,604 and 21,153 persons with dementia who received either RC or HC were included. Cognitive and functional statuses were measured using a cognitive performance scale (CPS) and an activities of daily living (ADL) scale, respectively. ResultsThe mean CPS score was higher for the RC group (3.2 vs 2.5). The proportion of individuals diagnosed when impairment was moderate to very severe (CPS ≥ 4) was higher in the RC group (32.0% vs 13.3%). The mean ADL score was also higher for the RC group (3.5 vs 1.6). The proportion of individuals diagnosed when they required extensive assistance or were totally dependent (ADL ≥ 3) was markedly higher in the RC group (72.3% vs 27.3%). All findings were statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis suggested that RC clients were nearly four times more likely than HC clients to be diagnosed at a later stage (odds ratio = 3.74, 95% confidence interval 3.54–3.95). ConclusionsPersons with dementia in RC facilities in Ontario are diagnosed when their cognitive and functional statuses have declined more than those of their HC counterparts.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.