Abstract
The ratio of household expenditure on a particular food to the quantity consumed is often used as a proxy for market price in cross-sectional demand studies. These unit values are likely to give biased estimates of price elasticities, so Deaton (1990) developed procedures for correcting these biases. However, empirical evidence on the bias created by unit values in demand systems is lacking so in this paper we use data collected specially to carry out comparisons with the results of using market prices. Our findings suggest that unit values, whether used in naive or improved estimation procedures, provide poor approximations to the elasticities calculated with actual market price data.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
