Abstract
In preparing inventories of ozone-depleting substance (ODS) substitutes, primarily hydrofluorocarbons, the US employs models consistent with Tier 2 methodologies from the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. The model calculates chemical consumption and emissions for 60 sub-applications, which are aggregated to five application levels. So-called “bottom-up” models require data and assumptions regarding the sub-application industries, including number of products introduced and retired each year, the type and amount of chemicals initially used, the emission pattern of the chemicals and if any released chemical is replaced. Once developed, the bottom-up model's estimates of chemical demand can be compared to “top-down” chemical consumption or sales. Combining these types of data gives a partial picture of the amount of ODS and substitutes introduced to the US economy. This paper examines the top-down data in comparison to the bottom-up estimates derived from the inventory models and discusses possible explanations for the differences noted.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.