Abstract

Millions of villagers in Bangladesh are exposed to arsenic by drinking contaminated water from private wells. Testing for arsenic can encourage switching from unsafe wells to safer sources. This study describes results from a cluster randomized controlled trial conducted in 112 villages in Bangladesh to evaluate the effectiveness of different test selling schemes at inducing switching from unsafe wells. At a price of about US0.60, only one in four households purchased a test. Sales were not increased by informal inter-household agreements to share water from wells found to be safe, or by visual reminders of well status in the form of metal placards mounted on the well pump. However, switching away from unsafe wells almost doubled in response to agreements or placards relative to the one in three proportion of households that switched away from an unsafe well with simple individual sales.

Highlights

  • Poor health stands out as a common feature of life in less developed countries (LDCs)

  • Recall that treatment was stratified by the prevalence of unsafe wells based on Bangladesh Arsenic Mitigation and Water Supply Program (BAMWSP) data and by union

  • It is possible that switchers from unsafe wells in B started drinking water from wells safer than the original one, but that in C switchers were almost twice as likely as in B to change to a safe well suggests that the placards played a role in allowing better choices

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Poor health stands out as a common feature of life in less developed countries (LDCs). Several studies have documented switching rates from an unsafe to a safe well after testing of between one-third and three-quarters, with higher switching rates in trials that provided information campaigns on arsenic health risks and repeat visits, in some cases with objective measures of exposure taken in the form of urine samples (Chen et al 2007; Madajewicz et al 2007; Opar et al 2007; George et al 2012; Bennear et al 2013; Balasubramanya et al 2014; Inauen et al 2014; Pfaff et al 2017) Despite these partial successes, a substantial fraction of households continues to use unsafe wells today and it is important to identify mechanisms to increase riskmitigating responses.

Program Description and Study design
Study Area and Program Description
Power Calculation and Study Design
Summary Statistics at Baseline
Variable Balance across Experimental Arms
Conceptual Framework
Results
Demand
Test Results
Responses to test results
Mechanisms
Responses Among Non-Users
Cost Effectiveness
Conclusions
33 Table 2
A: BDT45 B
B: Group sales
Details about Calculation of Normalized Differences
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.