Abstract
This paper presents the performance measurements from a comparison between FIFO ordered demand assignment/information bit energy adapter (FODA/IBEA) and two other TDMA satellite access schemes: faded environments effective distributed engineering redundant signalling (FEEDERS) and distributed allocation with request in fixed slots (DRIFS). The three schemes differ in terms of the scheduling of the channel capacity: i.e. centralised control in FODA/IBEA and distributed in the other two. All these access schemes have been designed at CNUCE, where the simulation tool used for the comparison was also developed. The two distributed control access schemes have been studied and simulated to analyse the behaviour of the capacity assignment algorithm. All the access schemes support an aggregated traffic, and the quality of the data transmission is guaranteed even when the transmitting signal experiences a severe attenuation due to bad atmospheric conditions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
