Abstract

This paper compares analyses performed via the distinct element method (DEM), employing rigid blocks and compliant joints, with results using finite-difference software (FLAC) obtained previously by other researchers. The paper then examines the capability of the rigid-block DEM at modelling joints realistically, with emphasis on the moment transfer between blocks. The line of thrust from this analysis was found to fit well with the well-established uniform catenary curve and the parabola, which has been used extensively in the rock engineering literature. This is an important verification exercise that is still lacking in the literature, especially for the rigid-block DEM. Finally, a comparison is made between the DEM and experimental work carried out previously by other researchers. The previously reported laboratory data were reinterpreted to derive more accurate contact laws in both normal and shear directions. A strain hardening or continuously yielding model was adopted in the latter. The calibration approach is demonstrated. The numerical findings suggest that improved predictions of beam deflections can be obtained and the predicted horizontal thrusts are comparable to the results obtained by FLAC.

Highlights

  • To predict deformations within a jointed rock mass, it is necessary to adopt accurate contact models for the rock joints

  • The same values of joint stiffness as those adopted in Tsesarsky & Talesnick’s finite-difference method (FDM) (FLAC (Itasca, 2000)) simulations were employed in the distinct element method (DEM) simulations

  • This paper has presented a rigorous DEM exercise that showcases the importance of using accurate contact laws to predict actual displacements resulting from rock block interactions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To predict deformations within a jointed rock mass, it is necessary to adopt accurate contact models for the rock joints. The experimental data of Talesnick et al (2007) and Talesnick (2007) were reinterpreted to derive more accurate normal and shear contact models.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.