Abstract

The profound black-box nature of Machine Learning (ML) based Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems leads to the problem of interpretability. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) tries to provide explanations to human users to understand the decisions made by ML-based systems. In this paper, we propose a software debugging-based approach called DeltaExplainer for generating counterfactual explanations for predictions made by ML models. The key insight of our approach is that the problem of XAI is similar to the problem of software debugging. We evaluate DeltaExplainer on eight ML models trained using real-world datasets. We compare DeltaExplainer to two state-of-the-art counterfactual explanation tools, i.e., DiCE and GeCo. Our experimental results suggest that the proposed approach can successfully generate counterfactual explanations and, in most cases, generate better explanations than DiCE and GeCo.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.