Abstract
The debating chamber of the House of Commons was rebuilt and completed in 1950. It has acted as a learning laboratory for 70 years for occupant satisfaction. Although trials and experiments were undertaken to assess and refine its design empirically, under real-life conditions it did not perform as the design consultants had envisaged. The present study of its history between 1950 and 1954 illustrates that its performance was scrutinised by users, became the subject of scientific investigations, and underwent further physical and operational changes. These critical engagements with performance in use are ongoing. A second period of use is also examined covering the period 1995–2019 using archival research and interviews. This reveals the sociotechnical nature of day-to-day operational procedures, involving collaboration between users and staff as well as between technical and non-technical staff. This process enabled a strong engagement with technical, environmental and human aspects of performance. Insights into the practical reality of building operation are illustrated along with process of continual learning and active stewardship. Practice relevance The post-occupancy history of the House of Commons provides a unique-case, rich study on continual institutional learning about environmental control in public buildings. It sheds a critical light on the nature of facilities management as a practice, and also challenges the traditional boundaries drawn between those responsible for the design, post-occupancy evaluation and routine operation of buildings. Facilities management could not be confined to the technological operations administered by technical staff, but depended on collaboration with occupants and non-technical staff, enabling the integration of social and technological processes. Much understanding was based on ephemeral knowledge that staff had acquired through social interactions and practical experience. The paper illustrates how such practical knowledge of performance was acquired, retained and used in facilities management practice. This expanded approach is also critical for design consultants to gain more appropriate knowledge about the actual use and performance of buildings.
Highlights
The debating chamber of the House of Commons was rebuilt and completed in 1950
Introduction: re-envisioning environmental control The current debating chamber of the British House of Commons1 was rebuilt in the 1940s to replace the original 19th-century chamber, which had been damaged during the Second World War
It was a bespoke system designed to address the specific challenges of environmental control inside the debating chambers, and its development was underpinned by physical experiments
Summary
The debating chamber of the House of Commons was rebuilt and completed in 1950. It has acted as a learning laboratory for 70 years for occupant satisfaction. Practice relevance The post-occupancy history of the House of Commons provides a unique-case, rich study on continual institutional learning about environmental control in public buildings It sheds a critical light on the nature of facilities management as a practice, and challenges the traditional boundaries drawn between those responsible for the design, post-occupancy evaluation and routine operation of buildings. The objective behind Faber’s scheme, strongly influenced by earlier studies undertaken by the NPL between 1913 and 1921, was to reconcile the conflicts between requirements for ventilation and thermal comfort, which affected its design physically and operationally In the former chamber, where the air was supplied through perforated floors, MPs had been exposed to the cooling effect of rising currents. His objective was to increase control over the indoor climate, first by using mechanical ventilation and air-conditioning, and second by exploiting advances in environmental monitoring and control technology (Figures 1 and 2)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
