Abstract

Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are the prime delivery vehicle for mRNA vaccines. Previous hypotheses suggested that LNPs contribute to innate reactogenicity and lead to the establishment of a vaccine adaptive response. It has not been clear whether LNP adjuvancy in the muscle is the prime driver of adaptive immune responses or whether delivery to secondary lymphatic organs is necessary to induce strong adaptive responses. To address this, we formulated reporter gene (NLuc) or OVA mRNA into LNP or coadministered the mRNA with empty LNP. After IM injection, we correlated the delivery with adaptive immune responses. Additionally, we investigated humoral responses to modified mRNA encoding the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Compared to unformulated mRNA encoding nanoluciferase, with or without co-administered empty LNPs, LNP-formulated mRNA resulted in high levels of nanoluciferase in the secondary lymphoid organs. Similarly, LNP-mRNA encoding ovalbumin led to a cellular immune response against OVA while free mRNA, with or without empty adjuvanted LNPs, caused little or no immune response. Finally, only mice injected with LNP-formulated mRNA encoding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein elicited robust cellular and humoral immune responses. Our results suggest that the mRNA delivery and transfection of secondary lymphatic organs, not LNP adjuvancy or RNA expression in muscle, are the main drivers for adaptive immune response in mice. This work informs the design of next-generation mRNA delivery systems where better delivery to secondary lymphatic organs should lead to a better vaccine response.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call