Abstract
e18080 Background: With a disproportionate global burden of cancer, access to care in low-middle income countries (LMICs) is a pressing issue. To our knowledge there is no literature that has described medical oncology (MO) workload in the global context. Here, we report the first results of an international study of global MO training, infrastructure and workload. Methods: A multinational panel of oncologists from diverse practice settings designed a 51 item online survey. The survey was distributed through a snowball method via national oncology societies to chemotherapy-prescribing physicians in 50 countries. Countries were classified into low or low-middle (LMIC), upper-middle (UMIC) and high-income countries (HIC) based on World Bank criteria. Due to small numbers, African nations were reported as a region. The primary objective of this study was to describe the annual number of new cancer patient consults seen per oncologist. Results: 708 physicians completed the survey; 14% (96/708) from LMICs, 21% (152/708) UMICs, and 65% (460/708) HICs. 85% (604/708) of respondents were MOs, 9% (65/708) clinical oncologists, 6% (39/708) other. Respondents worked a median 5 days/week and had 4 weeks of annual paid vacation. The median number of annual consults per oncologist was 175 (IQR 125-375); 16% (114/708) of respondents saw 500+ new patients in a year. Annual case volume in LMICs (median consults 425, 46% respondents seeing > 500 consults) was substantially higher than UMICs (175, 15% > 500) and HICs (175, 10% > 500) (p < 0.001). Among LMICs, UMICs, and HICs, median days worked per week were 6, 5, 5 respectively (p < 0.001); annual weeks of paid vacation were 3, 3, 5 respectively (p < 0.001). Among countries/regions with 10+ responses, the highest annual case volumes per oncologist were Pakistan (median consults 950, 73% > 500 consults), India (475, 47% > 500), Turkey (475, 25% > 500), Africa (400, 42% > 500) and China (325, 31% > 500). Conclusions: There is substantial global variation in oncology case volumes and clinical workload; this is most striking among LMICs. Further work is needed to quantify activity-based global MO practice and workload to inform training needs and the design of new pathways and models of care.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
