Abstract
This study argues that free choice items (FCIs) form a distinct class of lexical items. Just like other lexical items, they are associated with alternatives. Their core semantic property is that they have descriptive contents that bring information on these alternatives. In doing so, they form three interpretational categories: (1) full set FCIs, or else FCIs that express widening, require that all alternatives of the relevant type, without exception, are considered, (2) subset FCIs that express ignorance require that unknown alternatives are considered and (3) subset FCIs that express absence of preference require that non-preferred alternatives are considered. FCIs meaning components are encoded in the form of semantic features in the individual items and give rise to three grammaticality conditions for the class of FCIs. FCI grammaticality is analyzed in terms of a two-way feature satisfaction of the FCI's feature requirement vis à vis the alternatives under consideration.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.